Article critique in Higher Education Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Article critique in Higher facts of life - Essay Examplehe NSF/PTK project, the credibility of the originators to write about the NSF/PTK project is not as firm as compared to having all the three authors a member of the NSF/PTK project. The qualification of the authors would have been stronger if all the authors are members of the NSF/PTK project.The author of this article menti integrityd that the article was written to determine the impact of the NSF and PTK project in the quality of the companys development. It is good that the authors explicitly utter in Table I Phi Theta Kappa Award-Winning Colleges the name of the seven selected schools, the piece of campuses in each school, the number of enrollees and education program students together with its partnered 4-year institution that participated in the study. This information provides the referee a rough idea on where the study in this article was conducted.Funded by the NSF and PTK, the authors explicitly stated that the purpose of the study is to determine the impact or effect of the implemented national project on the 7 selected community colleges including the 4-year partner institutions in strengthening the Science, Mathematics, and technology components of the educational programs in each community college.The authors did not mention any research question or hypothesis in this study. This area is one of the weak points of this study. The article would have been written better by including some research question and/or hypotheses since it would allow the readers to have a critical thinking regarding the main topic of this article.There is no unfaltering literature review in this article. Since twain of the authors are professors and the other one is a teacher education instructor, most of the information in this article came from their own idea, perception, and experience in their teaching profession.mentioned that the NSF and PTK project has two rounds of funding wherein the first round is c omposed of seven mentor teams that worked with 18 selected community